Complementary conflict style is when partners use different but mutually reinforcing behaviors, while symmetrical conflict style is when both people use the same tactics, and parallel conflict style shifts between complementary and symmetrical patterns from one issue to another.
Avoidance lose-lose occurs when people ignore or stay away from conflict either physically or conversationally. Share your needs with the other person when the time and place is suitable and you are at your best.
Variables in conflict styles include gender and culture. There are small but measurable differences in the way women and men handle conflict, but the individual style of each communicator is more important than gender.
An escalatory spiral is when partners treat each other with matching hostility so that threats and insults lead to more threats and insults.
Focusing versus drifting is the idea that, in dysfunctional conflicts, the participants drift away from the original problem and bring in other issues.
Positive versus negative results describes the notion that functional conflicts have positive results, such as finding a solution that works, while a dysfunctional conflict has negative results, such as neither participant receiving what they want, and threatens the future of the relationship.
Direct aggression occurs when a communicator attacks the source of displeasure. Defensiveness is protecting oneself by denying responsibility. Agreement versus coercion is described when, in destructive conflicts, participants use coercion to get what they want instead of finding ways to reach an agreement.
Conflict exists in relational systems as it is determined by the people who are involved; when two people are involved in a long-term relationship they develop their own relational conflict style, which is a pattern of managing disagreements that repeats itself over time.
De-escalation versus escalation addresses the fact that in functional conflicts the participants solve more problems than they create, while in dysfunctional conflicts the problems grow larger instead of smaller.
A de-escalatory spiral results if the participants withdraw from one another instead of facing their problems. Compromise negotiated lose-lose gives both people at least some of what they want, though both sacrifice part of their goals.
Generate possible solutions by brainstorming. Foresight versus shortsightedness occurs when foresight is a feature of functional conflicts, while shortsightedness can produce dysfunctional conflicts. Define your needs by deciding what you want or need. In a functional conflict, participants achieve the best possible outcome, unlike a dysfunctional conflict, where the outcome falls short of what is possible.
The ways in which people resolve conflicts vary from one culture to another. Interdependence is another feature that captures the notion that people in a conflict are dependent upon each other.
Cooperation versus opposition means that cooperation is possible in interpersonal conflicts, although participants in a dysfunctional conflict see each other as opponents.Conflict is an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who may have compatible goals, but perceive scarce rewards, and interference from the other party in achieving their goals.
Introduction. Conflict can be defined as an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce rewards, and interference from the other parties in achieving their goals (Hocker & Wilmot, ).
an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from hoers in achieving their goals Expressed Struggle activated by triggering event, brings internal problem to surface. Chapter Outline. Conflict is an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from the other party in achieving their goals.
an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scarce resources, and interference from others in achieving their goals problem, solution, solution justification. an expressed struggle between at least two interdependent parties who perceive incompatible goals, scare rewards, and interference from the other party is achieving their goals Non-assertion: the inability or unwillingness to express one’s thoughts or feelings when necessary o Avoidance, accommodation Direct aggression: an expression of the.Download